[clarky241]

Originally Posted by madgod

Sony is better because it has better games and graphics. Nintendo dosent have the balls to make any good games and microsoft is taking other compones games and not making them themselfes. Also Xbox 360 and the Wii break to easily, the ps3 is sturdy and reliable

In my opinion, I think you're being just a little bit biased here. Let me tell you why....
Better games and graphics? I think you'll find Microsoft has the upper hand on the graphics, with a lot more attention to detail in their games than Sony. As for gaming, what comes more unique than the Wii? Nothing, that's what. The Wii gives a lot more to the gamer in terms of realism, since you really are becoming your character.
Nintendo doesn't have the balls to make any good games? What does that mean? Nintendo are well known for being more or less family-friendly (bar perhaps recent games such as Manhunt/Madworld), and this is their image. Nintendo puts more variety into their games than Sony and Microsoft combined.
Microsoft is taking other companies games and not making any themselves? Dead Rising? Left 4 Dead? Halo 3? Sound familiar? Microsoft probably have the biggest range of exclusives in a long time.
360's and Wii's break easily? What do you mean by easily? You do the same thing with them than you do with a PS3, and although the red ring of death is undoubtedly present on a 360, I think you'll find that getting a repair for a PS3 is a hell of a lot harder.
Please think about these aspects next time. Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are all great game companies who deserve much more than they receive.