why Sony is better then microsft and Nintendo

[madgod]

Sony is better because it has better games and graphics. Nintendo dosent have the balls to make any good games and microsoft is taking other compones games and not making them themselfes. Also Xbox 360 and the Wii break to easily, the ps3 is sturdy and reliable

[dylan55]

true that

[Mokarachi]

and the Wii break to easily

You're kidding, right?

Nintendo dosent have the balls to make any good games

• I guess the Mario franchise is apparently dead. News to me.
• Final Fantasy used to be on Playstations only. Now it's moved to Wii. Since it's there now, it sucks, right?
• Metroid Corruption...I guess since it doesn't have the gory graphics of a game like Call of Duty 4, it must suck. Is the brand new FPS style unimportant?
• I guess the world is completely wrong in your eyes for going nuts over Super Smash Bros Brawl. Can you explain what makes a good game to you? I'll do the same.

soft is taking other compones games and not making them themselfes

I have no idea where this is coming from. If you're talking first party games, then the system that does that the most is Nintendo, who, according to you, sucks. The system that uses virtually all third parties for games? Sony.

Sony is better because it has better games and graphics.

Most of the top games for Sony are also on 360 right now.

the ps3 is sturdy and reliable

The icing on the cake. I've heard more horror stories about PS3 than any other system. 360s also break down, but if you overuse your gaming system, it's to be expected.

[Mrclean214]

Actually, PS3 sucks, Wii have more great games than PS3, and 360 have more things to do online than PS3( Playstation Store!?What the F___)I don't really care about the graphic though.

[Yin717]

It's true the PS3 have great games and graphics. I have always hated XBOX so I wont say much about them. However it must be said the Wii has better games. Another good point about the Wii is that you can have endless controls because of the movements you can do with the remote. You have limited controls on the PS3 because you can only use certain buttons. The Wii is much cheaper, the games go down in price quickly, unlike the PS3 were apparently they go up. All in all I think the Wii rules. But the fight for the best console is between the Wii and the PS3

[Mokarachi]

Originally Posted by Yin717

But the fight for the best console is between the Wii and the PS3

Definitely not what the ratings say.

[Lukario]

Man, PS3 is so far the worst-selling console out of the other seventh-generation systems. Not only has it sold the least amount of units, it's also earned the least amount of money. I don't think Sony has ever made any first-party games, which is probably due to them being a software company not just a gaming company like Nintendo. Even Microsoft makes their own games, or at least they help. I understand it's your opinion, but your facts are all wrong.

Thanks,
Lukario

[Yin717]

OK OK. I'll admit. I pretty much know as much on these companies as I know about what's going on in my rubbish bin at night. lol. But you have to admit. The PS3 has had good publicity. Nintendo may have rubbish graphics but as I said it's game play that count. Anyway. Sony look at alot of areas don't they? They make TV's, cameras ect. What if they want to concentrate on them more?

[Lukario]

Just because they have bad sales doesn't mean the system itself is rubbish. I actually think the system is very good, but they are very expensive because they have the Blu-Ray player in them, so they end up losing sales in the long-run because of the price.

Thanks,
Lukario

[Yin717]

There also expensive because they have extras that the others don't have and you have to buy them seperate.